tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84917706771945233952024-02-18T19:05:50.480-07:00USA Country~Band of Warriors[Temporarily inactive due to family illness, until later.] Constitutionalists protect, defend, preserve, and uphold strict interpretation of U.S. Constitutional Law. All politics, therefore, should be judged in accordance with the intentions of the founding philosophers in the specific framing of the Constitution of America. Founding documents and The Federalist Papers, provide further insight for writing laws and adjudicating differences in judicial decisions rendered.
--Linda SantucciAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-76321820982786572472012-07-22T10:36:00.001-07:002012-07-22T11:30:35.121-07:00Foreign Propaganda: US Military Reveals Coup Plan To Topple Obama<div>
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The following is determined as "foreign propaganda". <strong>"Even this will not happen in America." </strong>However, the point of this "foreign propaganda" is that the information about actions of the president, could indeed be filed against Barack Obama and others involved at some point.... The "foreign propaganda" article was written and published <em>in the United Kingdom, reported below</em>. For further verification of the source, go to the EUT link to read the entire article, and <em>look for icon at the page to hear for yourself, the recorded news report</em>: <br /><img alt="" border="0" height="18" itxtbad="1" sized="no_ad" src="http://www.odiogo.com/images/odiogo_listen_now_77x18.gif" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px;" title="" width="77" /></span></div>
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
<a href="http://www.eutimes.net/2012/07/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.eutimes.net/2012/07/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/</span></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<strong><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></strong><br />
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Also available is <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muxdLFKb4M8" target="_blank">video of the report</a></em>:</strong> </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muxdLFKb4M8" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muxdLFKb4M8</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">________<br /><br />"Foreign Propaganda" Article published by the </span><a href="http://www.eutimes.net/author/admin/" jquery172049752602575318905="41" rel="author" title="Posts by EU Times"><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">EuropeanUnion Times</span></em></strong></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">:<br /><br />A shocking Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (</span><a href="http://government.ru/eng/power/95/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">MTC</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">) report red-lined to President Putin this morning warns that “various elements” within the US Military establishment are “actively planning” for the overthrow of President Barack Obama before the November elections.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><em><img align="left" alt="" border="0" class="aligncenter" height="186" hspace="7" src="http://weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/us-military-550x366.jpg" style="height: 186px; width: 280px;" vspace="7" width="280" /></em></strong>According to this report, </span><a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_07_19/Russian-marines-land-on-US-warship-during-RIMPAC-war-games/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Russian Naval Infantry Forces commanders participating in Rim of the Pacific-2012 (RIMPAC)</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> international naval war games off Hawaii (the world’s largest multi-national maritime exercise) this week were told by their US counterparts aboard the USS Port Royal (</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Port_Royal_(CG-73)"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">CG-73</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">) that Obama had to be overthrown as he posed the most dangerous threat to the United States since the founding of their nation.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">US Military commanders, this report continues, stated that American officers and soldiers, along with elected and appointed Federal government officials, all take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, of which they claim Obama is one due to his overturning of established law and constitutional precedents bringing their country to the brink of all-out civil war. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Of particular concern to US Military leaders, this report says, is the </span><a href="http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/statements/2012/may/04/chain-email/obama-has-added-more-national-debt-previous-43-pre/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">unprecedented level of debt </span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Obama has added since taking office that threatens the United States with an “</span><a href="http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/nielson2.1.1.html"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">economic Armageddon</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">” the likes of which has never been seen and would force upon the Pentagon </span><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/02/13/138781/heaviest-2013-defense-budget-cuts.html"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">massive cuts beginning on 1 January 2013</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Important to note is that just hours ago US lawmakers passed a </span><a href="http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2012/07/us-house-passes-huge-defense-spending-bill/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">sweeping $606 billion defense bill </span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">that exceeds a budget cap and faces a veto threat from Obama for failing to sufficiently rein in spending, and puts the Republican Party squarely on the side of those US Military forces seeking the Presidents ouster.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">When asked by Russian commanders what parts of the American Constitution Obama had violated, this report continues, their US Military counterparts listed a number of serious charges that include:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">1.) Obama’s </span><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/07/drone-attacks-lawsuit/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">authorizing the assassination of US citizens </span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">without their having charges made against them or being able to defend themselves at trials.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">2.) Allowing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct </span><a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2012-07-19/news/did-top-cia-official-enrique-ricky-prado-murder-in-miami/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">murders on US soil</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">3.) Allowing the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to tap the phones, intercept the emails, and in other ways </span><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303567704577519213906388708.html"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">spy upon the American public</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">;</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">4.) Allowing the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct against the American people the </span><a href="http://www.infowars.com/whistleblower-nsa-analyzing-conversations-in-real-time/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">largest spy operation ever undertaken</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">5.) Conduct an </span><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/15/obamas-unconstitutional-libyan-war/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">illegal and un-Constitutional war against Libya</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">6.) Obama’s </span><a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/19/obama-administration-rebuffs-congressional-inquiry-on-legality-of-gutting-welfare-reform/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">overturning of US laws by executive power </span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">without Congressional approval.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Of the gravest concerns about Obama these US Military commanders have, this report says, was his 6 July 2012 Executive Order giving him </span><a href="http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-president-order-communications-770/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">total power over all communication systems in the United States</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, and his 16 May 2012 Executive Order wherein he </span><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2012/05/17/obamas-america-yemen-first-policy-obama-issues-draconian-executive-order-to-silence-opponents-to-yemens-leader/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">outlawed any American citizen from writing or saying Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi was elected to office because he ran unopposed</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Both of these Executive Orders, US Military commanders said, “Strike at the heart” of the very essence of what it is be an American and which without the United States would cease to exist.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Most ominously for the American people are new reports being leaked by the US Military about Obama stating that his “mentors”, who include those of his inner circle, have long advocated the overthrowing of the Constitution and have openly discussed the “eliminating” of the </span><a href="http://www.infowars.com/insider-obama-idols-wanted-25-million-americans-killed/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">estimated 25 million US civilians they believe would oppose them and not be able to be “reconditioned” in their planned reeducation camps</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">To how Obama would “eliminate” such a staggering number of armed Americans, this report continues, would be by his unilaterally imposing on his nation the </span><a href="http://www.un.org/disarmament/convarms/SALW/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">United Nations Small Arms Treaty </span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">many experts are warning will be the </span><a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/12086-un-arms-transfer-treaty-att-on-small-arms-gun-grab-gradualism"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">largest gun grab in US history</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Interestingly, this grave report notes that what the US Military is planning for Obama they have done before when they planned for the overthrow of President Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 in what is referred to as “</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The Business Plot</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">”.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The Business Plot (also known as the Plot against FDR and the White House Putsch) was a political conspiracy in 1933. </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> warned that wealthy businessmen and bankers were plotting to create a fascist veterans’ organization and use it in a coup d’état to overthrow United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with Butler as leader of that organization.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In 1934, Butler testified to the Special Committee on Un-American Activities Congressional committee (the “McCormack-Dickstein Committee”) on these claims. In the opinion of the committee, these allegations were credible, but no one was ever prosecuted.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">And, in what can only be described as history making a full circle, the </span><a href="http://american_almanac.tripod.com/morgan4.htm"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">JP Morgan banking empire that financed the attempted coup against Roosevelt in 1933</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> appears to be behind the US Military plan to oust Obama too.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">According to this report, the </span><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/07/13/investing/jpmorgan-earnings/index.htm"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">$5.8 billion trading loss</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> JP Morgan reported this past week has been traced by Russian finance experts to a “great number” of shell companies under the control of former US Military officers designed to destabilize the Obama regime creating the pretext for the overthrow of the American President.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">To who will win this titanic struggle this report doesn’t say. But, it does grimly note that where the coup against Roosevelt in 1933 failed, these plotters have had a long time to learn the lessons of their failure making them less likely to fail again.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This entry was posted in </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/category/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">US Military Reveals Coup Plan To Topple Obama</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> and tagged </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/congress-didnt-honor-oath-to-protect-constitution/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Congress didn't honor oath to protect Constitution, conservative blog network</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/kagan/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Kagan</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/military-coup-on-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Military coup on Obama</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/rid-country-of-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Rid country of Obama</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">, </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/sotomayor-and-obama-care-at-one-time/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sotomayor and Obama care at one time</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. Bookmark the </span><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">permalink</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">_____________________________________________</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">End of "foreign propaganda".</span><br />
<a href="http://www.eutimes.net/2012/07/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.eutimes.net/2012/07/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/</span></a><a href="http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-topple-obama/#more-54482"></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></div>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;">
</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-47883188713276542782012-05-02T09:57:00.002-07:002012-05-07T06:59:39.009-07:00Video Course--"The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnUQJbr-8qlE5L9qxRTvKAGhS6CxHmIpZzSf7tAA8h05tDEXvKFiV0Uh-19QRyLPMysaKwzjq4znaokZQD_8aoWMLXgfteU41sTRSm9QXTdJXBD5A7bxnKzaBi85jMrN69r29Emjp5cC0/s1600/imagesCACEKR2O.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnUQJbr-8qlE5L9qxRTvKAGhS6CxHmIpZzSf7tAA8h05tDEXvKFiV0Uh-19QRyLPMysaKwzjq4znaokZQD_8aoWMLXgfteU41sTRSm9QXTdJXBD5A7bxnKzaBi85jMrN69r29Emjp5cC0/s1600/imagesCACEKR2O.jpg" /></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> So that the <em>average American</em> is privy to groundwork intelligent information concerning enemies of America, BE AMONG THE FIRST to get up to speed on the following. Even if you haven't been paying attention, or if you are on the front lines, all Americans are called to become aware of what the following "video course" can make plainly clear to all citizens of our great Land of Freedom.<br /><br />In an effort to get this out <em>soonest possible</em>, I am providing the following direct links. I hereby <em>urge</em> every dedicated, devoted American citizen to look into this expert Video instruction series. Suggestion: View each video in 10-15 minute increments, by using your pause button; you also can use the slider to backtrack your current download without losing it and having to start over again. For those who want to know what our top sources know, each part of the course will help integrate the necessary related topics throughout the American Conversation that American Citizens must begin having <u>NOW</u>. <strong>GO:</strong></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<strong>"Thankfully, we have been able to kill some dangerous bad guys. The sad truth of the matter is that, by almost any other measure, the prospect of victory is becoming more remote by the day. And no one seems able to explain the reason. In an effort to provide the missing answer, on April 24, the<em> Center for Security Policy</em> is making available via the Internet a new, free ten-part video course":</strong></blockquote>
<div>
<a href="http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><strong>The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within</strong></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"> ~ Created by the <strong><a href="http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18981,xml" target="_blank">Center for Security Policy</a></strong> under the direction of Frank Gaffney.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em><u>10 part VIDEO Course</u></em>. </span><a href="http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/</span></strong></a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><em><strong>The Course is also available at YouTube, using the links below.</strong> </em></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Course Overview:</strong> (15-min.) </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Videos by Frank Gaffney, President of the Center for Security Policy:</strong> </span></span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/ul2hpEOngyo"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/ul2hpEOngyo</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 1:</strong> (27-min.)</span></span><em><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"> <a href="http://youtu.be/Bs0xw5hPWVQ" target="_blank">The Threat Doctrine of Shariah and The Muslim Brotherhood</a> </span></strong></em><a href="http://youtu.be/Bs0xw5hPWVQ"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/Bs0xw5hPWVQ</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 2:</strong> (36-Min.) <em><strong><a href="http://youtu.be/PENiSQF-aJ8" target="_blank">The Brotherhood's "Civilization Jihad in America"</a></strong></em></span></span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/PENiSQF-aJ8"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/PENiSQF-aJ8</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 3:</strong> (38-min.) <strong><em> <a href="http://youtu.be/VuV5_CxHNnM" target="_blank">Influence Operations Against Conservatives and the GOP</a></em></strong></span></span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/VuV5_CxHNnM"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/VuV5_CxHNnM</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 4:</strong> (52-min.)<em> <strong><a href="http://youtu.be/EIfp11jaB98" target="_blank">Suhail Khan, A Case Study in Influence Operations</a></strong></em></span></span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/EIfp11jaB98"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/EIfp11jaB98</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 5:</strong> (35-min.) <strong><em><a href="http://youtu.be/EIfp11jaB98" target="_blank">The Organizations Islamists Are Using to Subvert the Right</a></em></strong></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://youtu.be/ZopkTICceus">http://youtu.be/ZopkTICceus</a></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>YouTube, Part 6:</strong> (15-min.) <strong><em><a href="http://youtu.be/t1G0mnDKi1U" target="_blank">Electing Islamist Republicans</a></em></strong></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://youtu.be/t1G0mnDKi1U"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://youtu.be/t1G0mnDKi1U</span></a> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><strong>YouTube, Part 7:</strong> (38-min.) <strong><em><a href="http://youtu.be/RUZeOHFgjsM" target="_blank">Advancing the Islamists' Agendas</a></em></strong> </span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/RUZeOHFgjsM"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/RUZeOHFgjsM</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><strong>YouTube, Part 8:</strong> (59-min.) <strong><em><a href="http://youtu.be/hhtG4k7sQbc" target="_blank">Team Obama & the Islamists</a></em></strong></span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/hhtG4k7sQbc"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/hhtG4k7sQbc</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><strong>YouTube, Part 9:</strong> (2:04-hrs.) <em><strong><a href="http://youtu.be/hVCDUTlo0sg" target="_blank">Team Obama & the Islamist Agenda</a></strong></em> </span><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/hVCDUTlo0sg"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/hVCDUTlo0sg</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>YouTube, Part 10:</strong> (1:05-hrs.) </span></span><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_1691032544">What's</a></span><a href="http://youtu.be/Lak8PLuI0gU" target="_blank"> To Be Done?</a></span></span></em></strong><br />
<a href="http://youtu.be/Lak8PLuI0gU"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://youtu.be/Lak8PLuI0gU</span></a><span id="goog_1691032532"><span id="goog_1691032537"></span><a href="http://www.blogger.com/"></a><span id="goog_1691032538"></span></span><a href="http://www.blogger.com/"></a><span id="goog_1691032533"></span> </div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-36169050333554489982012-04-27T10:31:00.004-07:002012-12-29T06:49:33.813-07:00America: Why Our County Sheriffs Must Be Constitutional Conservatives<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";">by Linda Santucci</span></i></span><br />
<h4 class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br />With Excerpts Following </h4>
<h4 class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
From <u>Our American Common Law</u></h4>
<h4 class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
Explaining the Power and Authority of the County Sheriff<u></u> </h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"></span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
</div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Socialism
is the launching pad to communism. This has been researched and tested in free
countries that eventually were overrun by socialists.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We need to be prepared for any situation in
today’s world, when someone comes knocking on our citizen doors, saying as
President Ronald Reagan put it, “I’m from the government, and I’m here to <i>help</i>
you.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span>
</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Members
of “The People” or U.S. citizens constitutionally are the very foundation of
all that has grown into place above us in the organizational chart, as “our government”
at every level across America, our shining City on a hill…. The foundation of
our government is represented the image of a pyramid on the dollar bill.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The square base of the stone pyramid
represents the foundation<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> of, by, for The
People</i>; the government is represented by the stone work built above the
foundation, with the all-seeing Eye of God at the apex of the pyramid. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;"></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">In
GOP Primaries and the General Election 2012, many Americans will again
unknowingly—put virtual enemies of America into positions of power. Their
apparent agenda is to continue the seven decades of the 20<sup>th</sup> C. implementation
of a planned take-down of America from within our own government. RINOs
(Republicans In Name Only) who look good, sound good, tell a very elementary, but
pretty picture story in order to be elected to power positions as Republicans. RINOS
help carry out the progressive agenda ironically, of the traditional leftist
extremists in the Democrat Party with some Independents. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It would be an insightful exercise possibly,
to watch Constitutionalist Republicans on the contrary, who unabashedly tell
cold, hard facts, give detailed solutions; yet they are bamboozled by the
leftist media and politicians of all Parties twisting and lying about
Republicans’ words and actions. Then especially, do the research of Constitutionalist
differences between candidates before going to the polls.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Electing
and re-electing County Sheriffs across our land may be one of the most crucial
issues facing us all, right at home in our own neighborhoods. Today there is
much required for Americans to know about the Constitution’s rule of America, especially
where illegal and unconstitutional issues have been wrongfully implemented into
laws that under false premises, Americans might be expected to follow.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Anyone
who is not up to speed on our national history and early American conditions
that led to the Declaration of Independence from England in 1776, is liable
even <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">inadvertently</i> to elect or
re-elect individuals today who are part of the problem and will not become <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">a part of the solution </i>in taking back
America to our founding roots.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">The
linked <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">World Net Daily</i> article today
prompted this discussion topic about our national history and the Constitutional
protections of individual citizens under the authority of our County Sheriffs
across America:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://alerts.worldnetdaily.com/HSM?a=ENX7CqhE3unN8SA9MKJYtxfnGHxKLJ3zyfcStGb5lw8W0bBhOG5mpqVsje_Hhe-ud1HO"><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: blue;">Sheriff Joe releasing more on Obama</span></span></a></span>”,
saying “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">I have no intention of resigning</i>”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">The
WND article provides much detailed information concerning certain individuals
in Arizona, who have been involved in underhanded tactics intended to thwart
and intimidate County Sheriffs of America. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The tactics against Sheriff Arpaio in Arizona
may also be part of a plan to further intimidate other American County Sheriffs
from using their constituted authority to do what must be done, should
conditions require use of their executive power to protect citizens of their
counties. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">The
activities of the Executive branch against Arizona’s Sheriff Arpaio apparently have
been carried on primarily outside the notice and publication of the mainstream media
locally and nationally. Below is an introductory comment from the WND article,
where I have added italics* to emphasize the final summary statement.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As an elected County Sheriff, Arpaio <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">cannot be removed</i> by another elected
county body, which in his case is the “County Board of Supervisors”. <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Only the Maricopa County Voters can remove
Sheriff Arpaio</i>, i.e.: </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgX-FHTkmzPP3SlfKTvyxHPsGrXtxly7CQ8xdKsL-AoLFA37ZA35uTqhvAHnq0mkdjQF_o7rp3Q8uWMCWgy1niFdGGyptw7D5hHUQ8yeDCNm3A_s4scO2qj7jOuOj4W_euwTqsQhCdqlII/s1600/WND-arpaio_pointing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgX-FHTkmzPP3SlfKTvyxHPsGrXtxly7CQ8xdKsL-AoLFA37ZA35uTqhvAHnq0mkdjQF_o7rp3Q8uWMCWgy1niFdGGyptw7D5hHUQ8yeDCNm3A_s4scO2qj7jOuOj4W_euwTqsQhCdqlII/s200/WND-arpaio_pointing.jpg" width="200" /></a>“Last week<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">, Arizona Republic</i> columnist Laurie Roberts wrote a piece in which
she reminded Arpaio of his pledge 20 years ago when he first ran as a candidate
for Maricopa County sheriff to serve only one term and turn the office into an
appointed post. Arpaio has said that his campaign pledge was a mistake, because
if he reported to a political official, he would have been fired 20 years ago
and not had the liberty to "do what I felt was right for the people that I
serve." <br />
<br /></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“WND has previously reported that political operative Randy Parraz, a
self-described "organizer," has been running a determined campaign to
oust Arpaio from office. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Parraz, together with a small group of activists operating under Parraz's
"newly formed organization, Citizens for a Better Arizona, have
unsuccessfully tried to disrupt meetings of the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors to demand the oversight group vote to request Arpaio's resignation.
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Arpaio, an *<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">elected sheriff, cannot be
removed from office by a vote of the county board</i>….”</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Again,
only The People have the power to elect, re-elect or replace their local County
Sheriff, when they elected him in the first place.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This represents an example of the Constitutionalist
system of the separation of powers with checks and balances throughout every
level of America. The constitutional safeguard of transparent walls functions through
the built-in processes of “a separate democracy” democracy in the local city
and county regions, and within the State government systems, and through the
federal system of separate but equal powers of our three branches of
government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In a phrase, we have a Constitutional
nationwide network of jurisdictions with limited power for each system, protecting
The People at every point along the way, where decision making occurs by
elected representatives and other officials who serve them. When all systems
for recourse fail, the problem at some point may be taken up by The People
through various means available to them as the foundation of the structure of
the systems put into place by government through other than appropriate
constitutional processes under the sworn oaths of individuals responsible.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Historically,
from the very signing of the Declaration of Independence forward in time to the
establishment of the U.S. Constitution, American Law was founded upon what has
been known as the “ancient system of Common Law”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Neither the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">English Common Law </i>that was in effect in England during the 18<sup>th</sup>
century, nor the earlier <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Roman Civil Law</i>
prior to the establishment of English Law, are considered to be within the
American version of Common Law, which is based upon <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">the Rights of Man</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">The
foundational information about this has been explained in a publication
entitled <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Our American Common Law<sup>1</sup>,
</i>copyrighted 1992-1995 by Delta Spectrum Research. Following the discussion below
in this posting, is a section with the high points about our County Sheriffs as
explained in <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Our American Common Law</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">The
Constitution of the United States of America, after it was ratified by the
first 13 States, became the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">American
Common Law</i> for each State of the Union, in addition to each separate State
Constitution that was written. Constitutionally, all laws by Congress and by
each State legislature must be consistent with the laws set down in the U.S.
Constitution. In any case, American Common Law concerned with the ancient
rights of humans on earth is embedded within the text, and thus, is integrated
with protections and requirements of the U.S. Constitution. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Protecting the Rights of individuals makes our
U.S. Constitution genuinely unique from any other national Constitution on the earth.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“Thomas Jefferson
placed great emphasis on the concept of Rights.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>He said we did not bring the English Common Law, as such, to this
continent; we brought the Rights of Man as evidenced through and by the tried
and true system of Common Law.”</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Why
should an American County Sheriff be a “Constitutional Conservative”?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In America, barring any exceptions of
Sheriffs being appointed instead of elected, the County Sheriff is an elected
office selected by The People of the county where he or she serves.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> To ensure the best possible protection of the County Sheriff in all matters of Constitutional Law, the County Sheriff should be vetted concerning his/her understanding of the role as County executive officer in all matters of the law, in the event of any catastrophe. The Sheriff is not only the go-to person, he or she is fully responsible for citizens' safety and property protection. Read the below excerpts from <i>Our American Common Law,</i> following the article.</span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Vetting
is as important for the office of County Sheriff as it is for any high
elected executive office in America, because the protection of the People is crucial
locally, right where they live.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>For the
safety and protection of lives and private, personal property of The People in
his county, the County Sheriff must be fully aware of his or her authority
under the law, should challenges be made to his authority, both by people
within his jurisdiction and also by individuals from the state and federal
government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Individuals running for the
office of County Sheriff may include people who have unconstitutional concepts and
intent about their duties and responsibilities, as the County executive officer
of the law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Once in office, who else can be trusted
to make the constitutional choices even in the toughest decisions to protect
their County citizens? The burden is upon The People to remain vigilant about
the political activities of their government officials and for determining
which candidates would make the best Constitutionalist County Sheriffs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Sheriff
Joe Arpaio, of Maricopa County in the region of Phoenix, Arizona, is one person
who has demonstrated that he knows the U.S. Constitution and all that it
represents for The People under Common Law concerning his duties and powers. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Sheriff Arpaio has the power of the State of
Arizona and the authority of the County of Maricopa system of law that are
fully integrated with the protections and requirements of his job under the
U.S. Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>His power and
authority requires the integrity and capacity which he has as an individual
American sworn to stand firm against those who have tried many ways to stop
him, from false accusations, to intimidation tactics.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Every County Sheriff should be such a
Constitutionalist in his or her willingness and intention to function in
accordance with the loyalty oaths for the responsibilities of the office.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Because
Sheriff Arpaio knows <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">what his job is about</i>
and who he represents as a sworn American for the citizens of his county, the
officials and others discussed in the WMD article, who in some way are
connected with the Justice Department of the current Executive branch of the
federal government, have been unsuccessful in their attempts either to eliminate
him from office, or to stop his investigation of Constitutional presidential
authority for the Executive office and his staff.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Sheriff’s life has been threatened
personally, as well….<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Because
Arpaio is now a high profile American citizen nationally, doing his job with the
utmost duly constituted authority, an entire nation is watching closely.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Those who understand the U.S. Constitution
also know the greater significance of all that Arpaio is about as an American
County Sheriff.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Indeed, I daresay in
these modern times, Joe Arpaio has become a national treasure and an
inspiration to all Americans especially who realize that we are under attack by
those at every level in America who want to make the U.S. Constitution
irrelevant and eventually intend to eliminate Constitutional rule altogether in
America.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Sheriff
Arpaio’s presidential and congressional investigation is according to and
within his Constitutional authority, and it is according to his sworn duty
under his personal loyalty Oath to the Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The investigation is undertaken as a result
of receiving signed petitions by Maricopa County citizens. The citizens asked specifically
that Sheriff Arpaio investigate the truth of circumstances surrounding all the
evidence of ineligibility uncovered.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Below,
quoted with permission of the publisher, from <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Our American Common Law<sup>1</sup></i>, are the excerpts that help to
explain the significance of Common Law as it affects the elected executive
office of the American County Sheriff.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>To understand more about the Constitutional authority and power of the
County Sheriff in America, please study the below information. Think, as you
read the material, why it would be the local County Sheriff who all Americans
would need to turn to in any event of a foreign attack in our State, or even in
the event of a natural disaster.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In any
case, the role of the County Sheriff includes protecting county citizens and
their property against “all enemies foreign and domestic”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The below is very simply written and to the
point in each section below.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Remember:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Support your local County Sheriff!<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In his or her County, the Sheriff is the
highest constitutionally authorized “executive officer” of the law.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">___________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;">
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">County Sheriff as Executive Officer:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>From <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Our
American Common Law</i><br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" />
</span></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“In [the
multi-volume] <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">American Jurisprudence</i>,
on Sheriffs, Police and Constables, we find the following:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">‘<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Origin
of Office:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></b>The office of sheriff is
an ancient one, dating back to at least the time of Alfred, King of England,
and the holder thereof has always been the chief executive officer and
conservator of the peace in his shire or county.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He is a county officer representing the
executive or administrative <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">power of the
state</i> within his county.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In
[America], the office is generally an elective one, and anciently in England,
sheriffs were elected by freeholders of the county, although gradually, it
became the custom for the Crown to appoint the Sheriff.’<br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" />
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“</span></i><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Common Law is the Law
of The People</span></b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“It is the sworn duty of the Sheriff to obey
and uphold the Constitution and to protect the property and <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Rights</i> of the freeborn, Sovereign
American individuals of the County.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“County Sheriffs must be advised of the
instances where unlawful acts or agencies of government are committed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is the duty of the Sheriff to protect the
local citizens from such unlawful acts, even when they are committed ‘under
color or law’.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“There is no lawful authority for Judges and
the Courts to direct the law enforcement activities of a County Sheriff.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Sheriff is accountable and responsible <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">only to the citizens who are inhabitants of
his County</i>. He is under Oath of Office, and need not receive unlawful
Orders from Judges or the Courts.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He is
responsible to protect citizens, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">even
from unlawful acts of officials of government</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He should not allow his office to be used as
an unlawful ‘lackey’ of the Courts or Federal agents or agencies.”</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“We Are
Our Government</span></b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“Since the formation of our Republic, the
local County (or Parish) has always been the seat of government for the body
politic (The People).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A County (or
Parish) government is the highest authority of government in our Republic as it
is closest to the body politic (The People) who are, in fact, THE GOVERNMENT.”</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“The Common Law of the States is founded and
grounded upon substantive titles in real property, and no mere legislative
enactment by Congress, State legislature, or County Commissioners.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Neither can judicial ruling by Federal, State
or County Courts operate to deprive The People of their <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Rights </i>at Law, including the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Rights
</i>inherent in their <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Allodial Land Title
Rights</i>.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“The Constitution of the United States of
America, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Article III, Section 2</i>,
authorizes Courts of Law and Courts of Equity; Judicial Equity is authorized;
but nowhere does the Constitution of the United States of America authorize a
single bit of either <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Federal Executive
branch of government <u>Equity jurisdiction</u></i>, or <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Federal Legislative branch <u>Equity jurisdiction</u>.</i><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In other words, the promulgation and
enforcement of Presidential/Congressional/Judicial edicts, dictates, rules,
regulations or policies, whether directly or through any Federal agent or
agency such as the FBI, CIA, EPA, OSHA, IRS, etc., or with the aid and
assistance of State or local lackeys is <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><u>unauthorized</u></i>….
Equity administration is in fact <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">theft of
Our Rights</i> [protected by the U.S. Constitution] and is a vicious
dictatorship by those who exercise it. (Note again: it was 1992-1995 when this
was written.)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“….Under the Common Law (Our Constitution),
no bureaucrat can dictate what happens to Our liberty or Our property.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The only entity that can determine punishment
(pass sentence) upon a freeborn, Sovereign American individual is a lawfully
constituted Common Law Jury…. Compelling a freeborn, Sovereign American
individual to do anything, except upon the verdict of a Common Law Jury,
constitutes an enforcement of the alien and evil Roman Civil Law, and is in fact
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">fascist totalitarianism</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;"> “Thomas Jefferson
has been credited with warning how the judicial branch of government would
usurp the authority of the Executive and Legislative branches of government and
turn the country into a <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">judicial
dictatorship</i>.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><sup><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">1</span></sup></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">“He was right—it has
happened.” </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">It
is often referred to as “legislating from the bench,” it is highly
unconstitutional, and it is extremely dangerous for the future independent
liberty of The People.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is happening
even more today, through the appointments of judicial individuals who have been
willing to render decisions according to personal preferences and politics,
rather than according to our specific statutes of Constitutional Law, our
Common Law as Americans who are inherently protected under the ancient
constituted Rights of humans on earth.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Our
Congress branch of government also has been undermined with individuals who are
willing to violate Constitutional law in the writing and passing of Bills for
the President’s signature making them law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Now it’s becoming more difficult to determine whether even a U.S.
Supreme Court will render a majority vote declaring that an unconstitutional
law will not stand.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, as has been
pointed out in “Our American Common Law”, an unconstitutional law is not a law
at all. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">With
God, anything is possible. God Bless America, and give us Constitutionalist
County Sheriffs, plus a majority in Congress and an administration in the
Executive branch, who also make decisions as American Constitutionalists.</span></div>
</span><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
</div>
</span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-16128843924900905592012-04-22T19:52:00.001-07:002012-04-23T08:30:25.803-07:00Regarding The Teachable Moment<span style="color: #990000;"><br />
</span><br />
<h3 align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"> </span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiuZHaE3pMhB82ba0UsvjAj6ijxn83XUXeEGFVfB37OJMX_T6sRer_WbhE3vhhfocOgLAEydYR8hAqepGUO2zk3EllKGZ-eoVmGCvC2OfeT28xRfzIQcktZyaQQUC6uJMuuVt3EqY-zUk/s1600/liberty_bell_Phily.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="color: #990000;"></span></a><span style="color: #990000;"><v:shapetype coordsize="21600,21600" filled="f" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" stroked="f"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter"> <v:formulas> <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"> <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"> <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"> <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"> <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"> <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"> <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"> <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"> </v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:f></v:formulas> <v:path gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" o:extrusionok="f"> </v:path></v:stroke></v:shapetype></span></h3>
<h3 align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiuZHaE3pMhB82ba0UsvjAj6ijxn83XUXeEGFVfB37OJMX_T6sRer_WbhE3vhhfocOgLAEydYR8hAqepGUO2zk3EllKGZ-eoVmGCvC2OfeT28xRfzIQcktZyaQQUC6uJMuuVt3EqY-zUk/s1600/liberty_bell_Phily.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="193" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiuZHaE3pMhB82ba0UsvjAj6ijxn83XUXeEGFVfB37OJMX_T6sRer_WbhE3vhhfocOgLAEydYR8hAqepGUO2zk3EllKGZ-eoVmGCvC2OfeT28xRfzIQcktZyaQQUC6uJMuuVt3EqY-zUk/s200/liberty_bell_Phily.jpg" width="200" /></a><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;">Analytical Observations and Constitutional Discussion</span></span></h3>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-small;">Secty of State Hillary Clinton's Tunisian Q&A</span></span> </div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: Arial;"><em><strong>by Linda Santucci</strong></em></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><strong>“Eternal Vigilance is The Price of Liberty” –Thomas Jefferson</strong> <br />
</span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> <span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">(Ref. </span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">John Philpot Curran, 1790 Speech)</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2; text-align: center;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><span style="color: #990000;">I. Introduction</span></strong></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-small;"><em>References for Part II</em></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000;"><strong>II. Analytical Observations<br />Discussion of Article II and the People</strong></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>Text of Article II of the U.S. Constitution</em></span></span></span><br />
<b><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;">______________________________________________________</span></b></div>
<br /><br />
<b><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";"><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2;">
<span style="color: #990000;"> </span><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">I. Introduction, pp. i-ii</span></div>
</span></i></b><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;">The below referenced PJTV article by Barry Rubin points out several issues with the manner in which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has recently represented the United States government to an audience in Tunisia.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><br />
<br />
One outstanding point is abundantly clear, which Rubin points to suggesting Secretary of State Hillary Clinton missed “a teachable moment” during the first week in March 2012 during a Tunisian Q&A.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is, contrary to her statement quoted below, the President <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">does not</i> represent “all of the United States.” One does not measure the nature of the United States concerning Israel, based upon what a U.S. President says and does, but rather by understanding all points of view and drawing one’s own conclusions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is the American way….</span></span><span style="color: #990000;">
</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000;">The U.S. President is an elected Executive Officer in charge of the Executive Branch of the federal government of the United States.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He is not a King or anything like a King in the U.S. Constitutional Republic.</span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">After the terrible times in medieval
Europe, especially over issues of religion before America was colonized
beginning in the early 17<sup>th</sup> Century particularly, America’s
government eventually was established in the late 18<sup>th</sup> Century, in
order to <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">form a more perfect union</i> of
the colonies of people that became separate States after the American
Revolution of 1776. America’s Constitution created a unique form of
representative government <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">of, by and for
The People</i>. The government was designed in a manner where it cannot
function apart from The People, due to the built-in checks and balances of the power
and responsibilities assigned by the U.S. Constitution, to the three separate
branches of government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The People, the American citizens,
function as the foundation of the government pyramid structure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The capstone or the top of the pyramid
figuratively represents the all-seeing eye of the universe, the greatest power
ushering in America’s founding; and the U.S. Government in behalf of a free nation
of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The People</i>, as defined first in
the American Declaration of Independence, is subsequently inspired in one way
or other, by the infinite wisdom of the divine intelligence of the universe. Freedom
of personal beliefs and the pursuit of happiness were at the top of the list in
writing the U.S. government framework outlined within the U.S. Constitution, so
that it is ensured that the American system of government cannot function
without the role of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The People</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-small;">Indeed, the U.S. Constitution was
specifically designed under a simple framework for the unique purpose of
protecting “the individual citizen” from the tyranny of the few in the government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The text reflects clearly that the U.S.
Constitution tells the government what it can and must do in the ongoing
execution of duties under the sworn loyalty oath to the Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The loyalty oath is required of every elected
and appointed official, even as employees of the government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All State laws must also comply with the
requirements and protections of the U.S. Constitution, even under State
Sovereignty established by the 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The American colonial experience
came to an end over issues of taxation without representation in the English
government system.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Therefore, in the
United States of America, the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">representatives
of The People</i> are the members of the U.S. Congress:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>House of Representatives and the Senate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The U.S. President is in effect the elected <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">chief executive officer</i>, who under
Article II is allowed limited power having to do with executing his
constitutionally defined duties under a separate authority and power of the
Executive Branch, different from members of the other two branches of
government, the Congress and Judicial branches.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>The People are the foundation of what is America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Their voice concerning government activities
is essential to the American process all the way to Washington D.C.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span><span style="color: #990000;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-outline-level: 2;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #990000;">Therefore, following is a discussion of the most
relevant issues concerning how our American government functions under the U.S.
Constitution “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">of, by, and for</i> The
People”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><strong>________________________________________________</strong></span></div>
<span style="color: #990000;">
</span><br />
<div class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";"><strong><em><span style="color: #990000;"><u>References for Part II</u></span></em></strong></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;">PJTV article by</span></b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;">Barry Rubin:</span></b></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><br />
</span></span><a href="http://pjmedia.com/barryrubin/2012/04/18/hillary-clinton-implies-pro-israel-sentiment-doesnt-reflect-america/"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;">Hillary Clinton Implies: Pro-Israel Sentiment Doesn’t Reflect America</span></b></a><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt;"><br />
<span style="color: #990000;">April 18, 2012<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span><br />
<a href="http://pjmedia.com/barryrubin/2012/04/18/hillary-clinton-implies-pro-israel-sentiment-doesnt-reflect-america/"><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin;">http://pjmedia.com/barryrubin/2012/04/18/hillary-clinton-implies-pro-israel-sentiment-doesnt-reflect-america/</span></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in;">
<br />
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><strong>Tunisia CNS Video:</strong><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> (Clinton Transcript Included)</span><br />
</span><a href="http://youtu.be/7j9bRZ0kWMw"><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><strong>Hillary in Tunisia Answering Question About Pandering to 'Zionist Lobbies'</strong></span></a><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><br />
<span style="color: #990000;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">March 6, 2012 <br />
</span></span><a href="http://youtu.be/7j9bRZ0kWMw"><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;">http://youtu.be/7j9bRZ0kWMw</span></a><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000; mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span style="color: #990000;"><br /></span><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><br />“</span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;">There are comments made that certainly <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">don’t reflect the United States</i>, don’t reflect our foreign policy, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">don’t reflect who we are as a people</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">“Secondly, I would say <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">watch what President Obama says and does</i>. He’s our President. <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">He represents all of the United States</i>, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">and he will be reelected President</i>, so I think that that <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">will be a very clear signal to the entire world as to what our values are and what our President believes</i>. So I think it’s a fair question because I know that – I sometimes am a little surprised that people around the world pay more <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">attention to what is said in our political campaigns than most Americans, say, are paying attention</i>. So I think you have to shut out some of the rhetoric and just <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">focus</i> on <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">what we’re doing and what we stand for, and particularly what our President represents</i>.”</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;">_______________________________________________</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left;">
<br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><strong>II. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Analytical Observations, pp. 3-5</strong><span style="color: #990000;"><br /></span><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><br />A significant Constitutional issue reared its head with Secretary of State Clinton’s concept of American politics, as she expressed it to the Tunisians in a Q&A session <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>in the first week of March 2012. In this viewer’s opinion, Clinton specifically created the impression to her foreign audience that somehow the President has <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">direct, independent sovereignty over The People of America</i>…. She suggests that the opinions expressed by any American candidate for office, or by their supporters, should be dismissed by foreigners as irrelevant.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">In her response (hear the video linked above), she said that “…comments made [by candidates or supporters] </span><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">don’t reflect the United States</span></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">, don’t reflect our foreign policy, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">don’t reflect who we are as a people</i>.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">She further stated, “The President represents all of the United States…. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Watch what the President says and does.” <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Americans watch what the President says and does, and they know for themselves as citizens, “the meaning of America and who we are as a people”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Tunisians could have been given a better understanding of Constitutional law in behalf of their growing democracy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>American opinions and intent about Israel are as much a part of the political campaign process, not because the President’s actions signal that for the first time since 1948 when Israel became a nation, our traditional support and defense of Israel has been shelved.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">It is a major issue of international relations in the 2012 election.In our international relations with Israel, where countless American Jews live and travel between our free nations, the President’s words and actions signal that under his leadership we are headed in a direction that is counter to who we are as the American people. The President does not “represent all of America”, on the issue of Israel.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I believe that at the least, even demographic statistics would not indicate that The People of America would sideline Israel and abandon Israelis from taking cues from the President and the Secretary of State.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This is why we have elections and re-elections—and all the discussions and rhetoric that go with the process.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; page-break-after: avoid;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">The U.S. President does not have the authority of a King in America <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">because of</i> the overriding, supreme Constitutional Law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The People elect the U.S. President through the constitutionally defined Electoral Process conducted by the separate, sovereign States, under Article II, Section 1 and further explained under the 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment to the Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The office of the U.S. President holds <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">no divine right to rule arbitrarily</i>, as in past European history.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; page-break-after: avoid; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">The next President of the United States will not be elected until American citizens cast their votes in the General Election on November 6, 2012 in every State of America. How would the Secretary of State be able to declare honestly that this President will be re-elected, as a reassurance to the foreign Tunisians in their erroneous view that it is “Zionists” who politically are behind the support of Israel. Yet, this is where she left it in March.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>She did not even hint that their view of a Zionist organization is the sole support in promoting Israel’s right to exist since it was first established after World War II. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Nor did she speak fairly about comments supporting candidates being simply irrelevant rhetoric.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">Moreover, regardless of anything Clinton said to Tunisians, they need to realize that the President <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">has limited power throughout all of America</i>, which is very briefly and simply stated in Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is a <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">restricted authority</i> that is not a matter of direct power over The People, except as needed in honest, true, national emergencies. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">Only Congress in the federal government, officially <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">represents The People</i> of America, no one else. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As representatives of The People, however, Congressional members of the House or the Senate also do not have direct personal power over American citizens Constitutionally.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">That said, Hillary Clinton certainly did not represent The People of America even in behalf of the President, in her response to the Tunisians. Americans are free to speak out about anything under the sun, so long as they conduct themselves lawfully. The Tunisian question in the video of the Q&A given above, concerns the daily unspoken <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Palestinian warring upon Israel, and whether Americans “support Israel” in any way. The Tunisian speaking, is further concerned about what the President intends to do at any time “about Israel’s” independent power to defend herself, and continue to exist.</span><span style="color: #990000; font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">The right to exist as a free nation was endowed internationally in
1948 in behalf of the Jewish people.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>That was at least some restitution for them to have a place to call
their own, where they could live in freedom, and in security, on their own soil.
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That was after the end of World War II’s
military defeat of the Nazi faction, who had caused the terrible deaths of millions
of Jewish people simply for being Jewish.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>That is fact.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Still today, there
are a multitude of wrongful issues delivered upon the nation and people of
Israel today. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Americans know this
largely because of the free speech of the Internet in America, with videos to
prove what they know. The primary media news outlets are not reporting the
daily attacks across the borders of Israel, killing and maiming innocent
citizens of Israel.</span></span></div>
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">In any case,
in America, The People’s constitutional rights and protections include an independent
choice of free speech and writing; freedom to research, read and hear different
ideas about live and living; of the freedom to associate and to assemble with
whom one chooses; and especially, the individual citizen’s free choices about
religious and other personal beliefs. </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: Times New Roman;">
</span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">The best analogy about the powers
of the U.S. President, which comes to mind after studying Article II, Sections
1, 2, and 3, may be this:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The President
is at worst, the top <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">go to</i> executive
officer nationally and internationally.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>At best, a U.S. President inspires America and other free nations by
explaining the traditional philosophical, as well as economic and
constitutional premises of the plans he has for the benefit of all of
America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A President at best today, also
may inspire foreigners concerning why the American Constitutionalist Republic
represents the best form of government for an as yet, still imperfect humanity
on earth.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
</span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">In declaring that Obama “represents of all of America” and implying that foreigners should ignore comments as being merely irrelevant, empty campaign rhetoric in search of votes, Clinton ignored that the American people are included, after all, in the Tunisian question of comments made in America about Israel.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Further, she ignored what is stated clearly within our Constitution’s Supreme Law, Article II, which limits and restricts the powers of the U.S. President.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Merely “watching what the President says and does” does not tell foreigners what America “thinks” as a People, and further it does not explain to foreigners the constitutional standing of what a President says and does, even during a presidential campaign for re-election…. Whatever the President says and does may bring a long delayed reaction throughout America, arising from The People through the Congressional Senators and Representatives. More importantly at the election polls in November 2012, The People will give their response, despite any legalities concerning what the President says and does.</span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">Indeed, unchecked unconstitutional rhetoric presented as American principles in words and deeds by elected and appointed officials may be found to be systematic and conducted with unconstitutional intent.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This often occurs through the most subtle, largely unnoticed manipulated methods. Later, Constitutional violations that occur in connection with those words and actions eventually become recognized as substantial threats to the freedoms of American citizens, and more so, a threat to the future of our Constitutional Republic of the United States of America. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">Thus, the old saying, “Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Therefore, it is incumbent upon all American citizens to be informed and to help keep others informed, especially when the news media goes silent on matters affecting the future of America as a free nation. This vigilance is part of the role that is intended for the American people, and we are seeing more of this today perhaps than ever in our history as a nation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Of course, Secretary Clinton did not take up her teachable moment with the Tunisian question….</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">Again, every elected official in government is required to publicly give their personal, sworn promise of the loyalty oath of office <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">to the U.S. Constitution</i>: to uphold it, and to protect, defend and preserve it in all actions/words and policies carried out while holding elected office, as true representatives of The People, and as true loyalists to the U.S. Constitution. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">In America, elected and appointed officials do NOT swear loyalty oaths to any individual person, including especially the U.S. President of the United States. The loyalty oath is sworn TO the U.S. Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Whatever was Secretary Clinton’s purpose in making the above quoted statement to the Tunisians, it remains that the Constitutional role of a U.S. President and his executive administration functions as a public trust under the same loyalty oath of all duly sworn federal employees, which includes the Secretary of State and all other staff members of the Executive Branch of the federal government.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<strong>III.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Discussion</strong> <strong>of Article II and The People, pp 6-9</strong></div>
</div>
</span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">The Executive Branch has power over its own certain specific Departments, whereas the Congress and Judicial Branch have separate powers over their respective areas of government, as defined in the U.S. Constitution. Thus, there are built-in checks and balances, with each branch overseeing in certain countless ways that Constitutional actions and policies are ensured within each branch of the federal government. When oversight fails in the face of tyrannical blocks of people at any or all levels of government, then The People are in serious jeopardy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="color: #990000;">The breakdown of the Branches in the U.S. Constitution is found in the following Articles, I, II, and III.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Text of Article II is found at the end of this paper.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font: 7pt/normal "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;">Article I:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Congress (House + Senate) </span></span><span style="color: #990000;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 1in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font: 7pt/normal "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;">Article II:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Executive Branch (Elected President + Appointees have power under the U.S. Constitution’s Advise and Consent Clause for Congress, as representatives of the States and The People) </span></span><span style="color: #990000;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 1in; mso-add-space: auto; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: Arial; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">3.<span style="font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font: 7pt/normal "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; letter-spacing: -0.25pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;">Article III:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Judicial Branch (U.S. Supreme Court + Inferior Courts). </span></span><span style="color: #990000;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">The Constitution’s premise of The People’s and States’ representation in the federal government of in Washington D.C. ensures that our Constitutional Republic continues a democratic process from one election to the next.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This process with built-in checks and balances on the power of individuals, and over the separate powers of the three branches of the federal government, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">requires open public discussion and debate</i> insofar as The People may hear or read the speeches in Congress and the Executive Branches. Fortunately today, The People may view the television proceedings on the floor of both houses of Congress. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Also, the Internet provides the text and videos of speeches and all required records of public discussions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is important that everyone understand what is being done in the legislation produced by Congress.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is equally important to be informed of U.S. Supreme Court proceedings and the written records, also available.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">Bills that eventually undergo a final Congressional vote by constitutionally elected members in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate usually involve compromises among different political factions within the Congress in order to get a piece of legislation through to a final vote.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The proposed ideas, the pros and cons, and other alternatives are expected through traditional democratic parliamentary procedure, to be presented by the members of the House and Senate, where eventually a certain level of consensus in favor of proposed issues over others may be achieved.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">As stated, Compromises are made in most cases by the time the final version of a measure becomes law.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, the compromises must NOT be about any action that would be a violation of the U.S. Constitution, again according to the sworn oaths of every elected representative and senator.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If a U.S. President signs such a Bill containing unconstitutional matters, an <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">unconstitutional law</i> is then the result.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Eventually unconstitutional laws are likely to be challenged if necessary, at any future point for a judicial judgment, all the way up the court system to the U.S. Supreme Court. It is the job of the judicial system to render decisions that eliminate some or all of a challenged law, especially to determine whether it violates requirements and protections of individual citizen rights or other related matters, rather than become anything beneficial to our American constitutionally protected way of life. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">Thus, the power of The People was designed by the founding philosophers, to go through channels to the elected district and State representatives in the U.S. Congress. Representatives of The People and matters of The States at the federal level have a constitutionally vested power <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">in their behalf</i> within the U.S. Congress.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Through both processes of the House and the Senate, each given their respective authority and duties in Article II, The People are fully, properly, Constitutionally represented on issues and policies <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">in their behalf</i>, and thus, in behalf of all of America.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">The President is elected by The People as required and outlined by the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The U.S. President has constitutionally based “executive Power” that is conducted in behalf of ensuring the security and prosperity of The People of America as a nation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, there is a Constitutional provision, giving the U.S. Senate and the joint houses of Congress the power of Presidential oversight by the House and Senate members who most directly <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">represent The People</i>. In any given situation where Congress may determine it is necessary, involvement concerning certain unconstitutional activities by the other branches of government is provided for in Article II, Section 2. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Congress is prescribed in the U.S. Constitution to do the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">work of The People</i>.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">As defined constitutionally, the U.S. President does the work of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">senior executive officer</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He is required to be certain his executive orders and policies are Constitutional.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He must also carry out the Laws enacted by the Congress and signed into law by other Presidents and himself, so long as they <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">are Constitutional</i> in their intent and effect upon The People and the Constitutional government of the free nation of America. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He and his appointed department heads and staff members have the responsibility to protect the Constitutional freedoms of citizens in America in all he says and does. The U.S. President is responsible in his words, actions, and policies—for the full <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">faithful execution of Constitutional law</i>, under Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Only Congress may initiate legislation that may become laws, so in effect a President’s executive orders are considered to be presidential policy for reasons that the President should be prepared to prove at any given time, are or continue to be Constitutional, if it becomes necessary.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Executive orders are for the federal employees including Heads of the Departments in the Executive Branch of the federal government.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">Further, Article II, Sections 2 and 3 provides that the U.S. President must function under certain defined conditions, “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">and he shall have Power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate</i>,” and also is subject to the oversight of the entire Congress by Law should it become necessary in a Congressional Impeachment investigation. In fact, the Congress under the U. S. Constitution is expected to have detailed reports from the President <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">on the activities</i> of his executive decisions including executive orders, and the actions and policies of his appointees.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>These reports are in addition to the traditional public State of the Union Address to a joint session of Congress.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">But more to the point here, the President answers at the bottom line—TO The People across America, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">through their elected representation in Congress</i>, both houses.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>For as long as a President functions within the parameters of his sworn Loyalty Oath in executing his duties in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, The People’s Representatives will not use Congressional Constitutional power concerning decisions and actions that have been made by a sitting President.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is an understood condition of the Constitutional Separation of Powers among the three branches of the federal government that, except when the Congress determines that a President has acted in violation of the U.S. Constitution, the Congress will not get involved directly in the matters of the Executive Branch as explained under Article II, Section 2.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">In the meantime, The People, citizens of our Constitutional Republic of the United States of America are expected to say freely and openly without fear of government reprisals, what they believe, correct or wrong, about the words and actions of the U.S. President, as well as other government officials. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is a constitutional process for the active involvement of the American People. They are free to petition the Congress to take action on any cause they believe in, as long as their actions are in accordance with law, and are not in violation of the U.S. Constitution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The representatives are responsible for what they decide in behalf of Americans and the future of America. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">This is what is behind the misleading inadequacy of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s statements that were made in answer to the question from a Tunisian in her Q&A audience.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Again, listen to the video at the link above, and determine for yourself whether Clinton did not properly answer the teachable moment that would properly have represented the nature of America’s constitutional system of a Democratic Constitutional Republic, with checks and balances upon the power of government officials in behalf of The People of America.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">________________________________________</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">
<span style="color: #990000;"> </span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><strong>Text of Article II of the U.S. Constitution</strong></span></div>
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">Article II, Section 1</span></i></b><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He shall hold his Office during the Term [prescribed, with new law limited his tenure to two terms of four years].<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Each State shall appoint in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress….” [See copy of the U.S. Constitution for requirements of what has come to be known as the Electoral College process, and the requirements of eligibility to run for the office of U.S. President]. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">Article II, Section 2</span></i></b><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>….“He shall have Power, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">by and with the advice and consent of the Senate</i>, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> nominate</i>, and by <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">and with the advice and consent of the Senate</i>, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law; but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">as they think proper</i>, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="color: #990000; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">Article II, Section 3</span></i></b><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: #990000;">:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, in extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in the Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">
</span><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">and shall be
established by Law; but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such
inferior Officers, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">as they think proper</i>,
in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">
</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #990000;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">Article II, Section 4</span></i></b><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-latin;">:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-39087003998389652182012-04-17T12:25:00.000-07:002012-04-18T21:40:00.163-07:00Peter Ferrara: Worst USA Recession Since Great Depression<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">The below video (6:01 min.) was sent
to Republican voters this week. It is a detailed presentation by Senior Public
Advisor, Peter Ferrara, for Speaker Newt Gingrich’s GOP 2012 Presidential
Campaign. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All Americans should hear it
as a matter of record in knowing about the economic failure of the Obama
Administration, before making up our minds as a Nation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Those who will be going to the polls to cast
the remaining, decisive votes in the GOP Primary Elections especially need to
see this video. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">As I read the introduction letter from Vince Haley, Campaign Manager, I
was once again deeply troubled remembering the most outrageous, false attack
upon a great American that I’ve ever seen in my lifetime.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">It was a terrible most unfair and
dishonest smear campaign against Gingrich, beginning in 1995 when he was
Speaker of the House.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Today the knife in
his back since 1995 has been twisted sharply, going for blood—especially with two
other leading candidates, Santorum and Romney.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>First it was Santorum in the South Carolina Debate, and then Mitt Romney
in the next debate for the Florida Primary.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Newt Gingrich was ambushed with an already resolved case of false
accusations by the Ethics Committee in 1995, resulting in shear gentlemanly
acquiescence in resigning, which had been the traditional practice in
Washington—to keep the peace so elected officials could get on with the work of
The People.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">The lie of Congress in 1995-96 had
been realized since the late 1990s, but too late after Gingrich resigned and
went back to his private career as a college professor, who later additionally
started his own publishing business. Newt's Congressional Record as Speaker of the
House was excellent pristinely, <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>uniquely
when compared with any other Speaker of the House in modern times.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He himself has been addressing issues very
clearly throughout his 2012 campaign, and also other old political friends no
longer in office, have been shouting the details of his talent, his integrity,
and his fierce fighting spirit, in an effort to help reverse the damage caused
by simply falsely accusing him after 1995.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">In the Florida GOP Primary Debate,
Romney stated a lie about that list of accusations with the same forceful
emphasis Santorum had used in South Carolina--<i>as though</i> their statements
were true. Santorum shouted, “WE Threw You OUT!”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Not exactly, but RINOs we know today, were
part of the push to rid themselves of Newt Gingrich, because he would not get
out of their way….<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When Romney stated
with a blast of convincing <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">authority</i>,
one of the false charges Gingrich was accused of—as if it was fully proven, when,
in fact, it had been officially declared untrue by the appropriate panel of
ethics members.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">At that moment, Americans watching
the live telecast saw something very interesting in Newt.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Newt very clearly and obviously was so
stunned, so deeply astonished to hear this kind of false attack from Mitt, when
Newt knew that Romney KNEW better, Newt was simply speechless trying in the few
on live camera that he had, to give the definitive response to such a repeated
lie—used knowingly, but surely with the concept of “plausible deniability” common
in run-of-the-mill politics today.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Indeed
Romney simply smiled a fine gentleman's winning smile, a silent kind of steady
smile as if inside he was laughing out loud, for having fully, undoubtedly achieved
his well-rehearsed intended non-verbal blast on live television, that sent an
arrow straight into his opponent’s, now seen as an innocent naïve, and every
bit, his true, sincere heart behind Gingrich’s campaign for a renewed Contract
With America in 2012.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Romney’s smile
with a great radiating direct stare at Gingrich, said very loudly and unspoken
in that moment that <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">he </i>had <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">non-plussed</i> Newt Gungrich, and believed
he had him in a corner where he could not budge: <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>"<em>Gotcha!"</em></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Indeed it was Newt's <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">non-plus Romney moment</i>, when he could
only stare, stunned to the core, speechless, and disbelieving at Romney. Then
the moment passed when the debate proceedings continued without a word of
response to Romney from Newt Gingrich.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">However, I believe that it was in
that very moment, when I personally recognized so very ironically that what I
was seeing in Newt Gingrich then, was the unabashed genuine, sincere,
well-intended, and even naive quality of Newt Gingrich’s pureness of heart,
pureness of a man with all his fingers on the buttons of the great issues
facing humanity in America in these times—but who knew well how to play his
hand, and now was not the time to carry on that debate again, because it is no
longer officially “a debate”; he had been exonerated before the 90s was
over.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, he knew from then
forward, this observer believes, that no longer would this be a “team fight”
for the Republican Party to come up objectively with the best candidate to win
against Obama, or anyone else the Democrats might put up against the GOP.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Newt Gingrich had been blind-sighted
again, as he had been after 1995.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Not
only was that issue over and gone then, it was revived today for an all new
American voter roll, that includes the children of those who voted in Ronald
Reagan as U.S. President, and returned Congress in 1995, back over to the
Republicans.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The children who are adults
today, do not have memory first-hand, and did not study this event of Congress
vs. Gingrich for their own personal agendas, so it is a great reason why Romney
and Santorum got a foothold in several Primary Elections since Florida.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our younger generation, in fact, could spin
another crucial election in favor of someone, Democrat or Republican, or Independent
though unlikely, when the ramifications looming over Election 2012 is loud and
clear to people who do remember Speaker Newt Gingrich.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Baby Boomers and Elders do tend most
to realize more and more each day <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">that
for our times</i>…. Newt Gingrich is the most intelligent, most
well-integrated, knowledgeable, broad-based talented individual, made of all
the right stuff to <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">get the job done</i> one
more time when it will stick now, returning America back again to our
Constitutionalist roots.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our basis lies
in the rule of our Supreme Law, our Constitution that designed specifically to
protect the American <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">individual citizen</i>
from all enemies foreign or domestic, permitting every American the best
freedoms of opportunity where everyone can choose the best available path of
individual, independent success possible.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Newt was believed to be blown down
without a hope of the ability to come back once again, and make it stick this
time for the most crucial GOP nomination we have ever faced in all our
history.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He’s been doing it—even as the
turtle racing the hare.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All those
magnificent, successful years working with and against tax policies considered
by President Ronald Reagan, and also fighting ferociously against socialist
policies of the William Clinton administration, when Newt was Speaker of the
House he was a U.S. President in training, and likely didn’t know it
himself.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>America today is coming to
realize, for the 21<sup>st</sup> Century, Newt Gingrich is a new kind of
technological man for all seasons. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>From
that moment on, when Mitt laughingly non-plused Newt in Florida’s debate, Americans
who previously <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">were won over</i> by
Newt's own debate performances and campaign townhall meetings, were turned aside
by their own personal, naive lack of self-confidence about who they had
believed "is" the real Newt Gingrich.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Such uninformed people have not known the history of the 80s under Ronald
Reagan's national leadership. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">N</span>ewt
Gingrich and countless great numbers of American citizen Constitutionalists realize
that what happened to Newt in 1995-96 was part of the same far-leftist radical
agenda for America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Had he become the
next U.S. President after Clinton’s failure to go far enough in a socialist
direction, Newt Gingrich would have taken it all the way back in a two-term
presidency, to our Constitutionalist roots and traditions in government. 1994's midterm election of Congress was a <i>landmark</i>
Election. The inability to have leadership power by Constitutionalists
traditionally, was all the way from 1929, the last time Republicans had controlled
the leadership of Congress. The House and Senate in Election 1994 turned over to
GOP leadership in the most powerful take-back of American Constitutionalism ever
in modern history.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">There was a very significant reason for that in 1994. It was not so unlike the
realization of Americans today, who more than ever perhaps in U.S. history know
now that our nation has been under siege intending a take-over <i>coup</i>--ever
since the Wilson years began in 1930. Election 2012 is considered to be the
most crucial turning point in our times, when the U.S. Constitutional rule must
be fully re-affirmed once and for all.... </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Election 1994 was not enough, even
though the election results turned over Congress to the traditional
Constitutionalists in the Republican Party. Citizen voters who were "the
adults" in the room in 1994, did not yet realize America had already been
on the road to destruction as a free nation, for decades since 1930 especially.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">The great <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">coup</i> against Newt Gingrich as Speaker, was performed by the
socialist crowd that had been embedded within the U.S. Congress for decades
since the 1930s—was the first great battle won against Constitutionalist
America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It was in setting aside Newt
Gingrich in 1995, after Nancy Reagan declared, “… and now Ronnie has passed the
torch to Speaker Newt Gingrich,” where under his leadership, the full
changeover of Congress was expected to be carried to greater heights for the
future of America’s standing as a free nation, governed “of, by and for The
People.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan had
beat socialist Jimmy Carter’s campaign for a second term, and William Clinton won
over George H.W. Bush’s second run for the White House. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Newt Gingrich was there.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He saw it all happening, and as an
outstanding Speaker of the House, he was indeed fierce in winning
Constitutionalist measures in behalf of America, under both Reagan and Clinton.</span><br />
<br />
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">However</span></i><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">, what we also got in the House and Senate after Newt was
gone after 1995, was a Congress replete with “Republicans in Name Only” (RINOs),
who had now embedded themselves fairly unnoticed, until there were three
separate attempts at “comprehensive immigration reform” legislation. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It was the wake-up call for American citizen
Constitutionalists. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>American citizens
finally took note of what had been really happening within our federal
government system since the 1930s.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We
became overrun in Congress with individuals from<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> both</i> major political parties, who would not uphold their oaths for
preserving Constitutional provisions in the legislation that Congress began
producing even under the leadership of Republicans….</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">The reason for our Congress becoming so overrun by leftist extremists in both
major political parties, is that <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Newt
Gingrich was effectively thrown out</i>, even though he had resigned as a
gentleman intent on getting on with the people’s business of government; and
America was fooled all the way to 2012.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>He later was fully, fully exonerated of ALL accusations made by the
ethics committee, and still Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum used the old news of
lies in order to further their own campaigns for the GOP nomination….<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>NEWT is BACK.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Had he been free of the stranglehold implemented by specific individuals
in Congress now considered to be enemies of America by significant numbers of
citizens—Newt would have been the next President after Clinton, this citizen
believes, and perhaps the leftist agenda would never have gained such a
foothold as we recognize today, is a socialist launch pad into the depths of
Marxist dictatorship.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It eventually
would create conditions from which America will never be likely to recover
again as an independent <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">free nation</i>,
without another full-fledged, violent Revolutionary War.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Please listen to this run-down by
Peter Ferrara, of Gingrich’s economic plan vs. Obama’s record to date, creating
now what is considered to be the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">worst
recession in American history since the Great Depression</i>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Peter Ferrara, Senior Policy Advisor,
presents the detailed facts in the 6+min. video at the link below.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Please check it out, no matter how you may
feel about either Romney or Gingrich, because when it’s time to debate Obama, we
need a man who is going to have the broad foundational knowledge and experience
Gingrich has, in order to defeat Obama soundly, and resoundingly in the
November 2012 General Election.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Please do
not forget:</span></b><span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Gingrich was <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">stopped from debating
Romney, Santorum and Paul, when the three banded together saying that THEY
would not participate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></i>The debate organizers
could not go forward with the prior planned debate schedule.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><u>What does this say about Romney and
Santorum concerning “any means necessary” to try to win against Newt Gingrich</u>?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>After all, enough Americans now know that
Newt is the only truly and fully educated scholar, and also is the individual
with the essential stringent experience of having dealt with both a Democrat
and then a Republican Congress in the 1980s and 1990s under both Reagan and
Clinton, where it was his own innate personal knowledge and talent, combined with
unique leadership skills which unified the House Republicans and motivated
Americans in Election 1994 to give the GOP their first Congressional Majority
since 1929…. <br />
<br />
We need to get back to that place now, with Newt Gingrich as the President of United
States of America.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>His opponents who
falsely scorned him, also refused to put themselves in another debate where
Gingrich would nail then to the floor on their policies, no holds barred after
the Florida and South Carolina debate!<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>It’s high time and <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">just in time</i>
for America, that what goes around comes around, and Newt’s in it all the way
to Tampa, for a great GOP Delegate <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Win</i>
in behalf of and <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">because of</i> all
Constitutionalist Americans today—young and old, who do “get it” NOW.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>God Bless America!</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 4pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;"><br />
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Video:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span><a href="https://www.newt.org/donate/obamas-ticking-tax-time-bomb/?utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_medium=email&utm_content=mainimage&utm_campaign=battletested" target="_blank">Obama’s Ticking Tax Time Bomb, by Peter Ferrara, Senior Policy Advisorfor Newt Gingrich</a></b><br />
<strong></strong></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCTIzAzHupFmu3v1cC0jQyj-gbO6eRczFY8rOj6Pd9RjIr5MWLCGd1U9mGkACeXyUxedQqRX7i81Up_TYNw37vsoW8cQV9vgBf-BRvr_ojqkHbjT4YBr0oUaMq79y-II6y-Q4_lI4-ntY/s1600/Obamas-TimeBomb-Reagan.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="173" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCTIzAzHupFmu3v1cC0jQyj-gbO6eRczFY8rOj6Pd9RjIr5MWLCGd1U9mGkACeXyUxedQqRX7i81Up_TYNw37vsoW8cQV9vgBf-BRvr_ojqkHbjT4YBr0oUaMq79y-II6y-Q4_lI4-ntY/s320/Obamas-TimeBomb-Reagan.bmp" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 4pt;">
<br /></div>
</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 4pt;">
</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-19574929358132897922012-04-15T09:09:00.001-07:002012-04-15T09:13:56.088-07:00America, The People: Choosing Individual Change We Can Believe In<div class="headline_meta" sizcache="3" sizset="20">
<span class="author vcard fn">Kyle Ebersole</span> published this article on <abbr class="published" title="2012-04-12">April 12, 2012, at Conservative Action Alerts:</abbr></div>
<div class="entry-title">
<strong>"Individualism as an American Tradition"</strong>.</div>
<div class="entry-title">
<br /></div>
<div class="entry-title">
I highly recommend it, because he <em>did the research</em>, and the words of others from the past, helps people to see the way and means to return to the way of thinking that made America truly great in the first place. Please read his article at: <a href="http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/individualism-as-an-american-tradition/">http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/individualism-as-an-american-tradition/</a> </div>
<div class="entry-title">
<br /></div>
<div class="entry-title">
Here below is just one of the fine quotes he provided in his article, to give you an idea why I am recommending it now. From a past Kansas Governor:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div sizcache="3" sizset="25">
' “We were able, I believe, to do a reasonably good job of local government. In meeting and solving our problems we looked to the state government very little and to the national government not at all. The citizens of the county knew who their elected officers were. They came and talked with us frequently. We knew their difficulties. We dealt with them across the desk, over the counter, and sometimes down at the corner drug store. They had definite opinions about the affairs of the county. They spoke their minds freely and they <a href="http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/individualism-as-an-american-tradition/#" id="_GPLITA_2" in_hdr="null" in_rurl="http://www.textsrv.com/click?v=VVM6MTUxOTA6NTY1OnJlZ2lzdGVyZWQ6MDkzZDJlNjA2NTFlNzNhNWEwMDdmYmNlNzRlYmQyMGU6ei0xMDkwLTIwNDg0Ond3dy5jb25zZXJ2YXRpdmVhY3Rpb25hbGVydHMuY29t" title="Powered by Text-Enhance">registered</a> their approval and disapproval directly at the polls on the second Tuesday of the next November. There was no doubt and no uncertainty about it. </div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div sizcache="3" sizset="25">
'“Now, that has been a matter of only about twenty years — a short time indeed in the history of people. But in that twenty years there has taken place a most astonishing change.... There is scarcely a problem presented to the county officials of today which is not either directly or indirectly involved with implications and issues related occasionally to state, but more often to Federal, regulation....'' </div>
</blockquote>
Continue reading the past Kansas Governor's quote and Ebersole's entire article on the issue of American individual independence. It demonstrates the Change that came to America through the error of federal government insinuating itself into the individual lives of citizens, violating State sovereignty and Local government independence of The People. <a href="http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/individualism-as-an-american-tradition/">http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/individualism-as-an-american-tradition/</a><br />
<br />
Personally, I would state differently, that individualism is far more than a tradition. It has been the Law of The Land since the founding philosophers wrote out the Declaration of Independence and other founding documents, including <em>The Federalist Papers</em>, complete with all the debates over every detail of what later was written into the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution was designed by founding philosophers most specifically <em>to protect the individual American citizen from the tyranny of government</em>. The separation of powers among the three branches of the federal government, extends as well to the separation of other powers with checks and balances of the government, all the way down to the State and Local levels. The democratic process of, by, and for The People begins right were they live. In effect, The People were designed to BE the <em>very foundation </em>of all America, given by the U.S. Constitution, their own separate individual powers of Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness over their citizen lives vs. any other potential tyranny by either the Federal, State, or the Local governments. <br />
<br />
In this manner, The People function <em>independently in their freedom to choose and live freely</em>, so long as others' Constitutional protections are not violated. Citizens are FREE even to making their own mistakes and correcting them through their own steam, and the power of others who also <em>may choose</em> independently to come to their aid. The People especially were given Constitutional powers and the means to <em>take care of themselves</em> in the event any government official or government body, through any policies of government at any level, might attempt to limit unlawfully their Constitutionally protected rights as citizen individuals. The U.S. Constitution makes <em>The People</em> equal participants in the making of choices and decisions by Federal and State governments, particularly where the U.S. Constitution specifically <em>limits their power</em> over or in the lives of individual citizens.... <br />
<br />
It is very clear to see the methods and nature of government actions that have been taken throughout America at every level today following all those decades since the 1930 Wilson years. Particularly, those who would entirely <em>reject Constitutional restrictions upon the federal government in Constitutional Law</em> and ignore the Law while doing what they choose to do even as mere <em>representatives</em> of The People, have demonstrated over and again that indeed, they have had another plan in operation. They have inch-wormed their way over the decades to a point now of virtual open tyranny against the individual American citizen--at every level of individuals' personal and private lives.<br />
<br />
Known as "Progressives" all through the decades, they are now recognized more and more as <em>fascist thinkers</em> bluntly, with behavioral intent to make the U.S. Constitution irrelevant, and therefore take over America. The results of their decades of undercutting Constitutional powers that would limit their ability to ignore Constitutional Law, eventually would have America fully functioning at the very worst, outside the <em>prescribed Constitutional protections of the individual citizen</em>. That is, if not stopped by other Constitutional provisions, either in the House of Representatives in Congress or by other Constitutional means necessary. If not stopped, the net result would be that they would also find a way to discard the U.S. Constitution entirely, and replace it with an entirely different government system where America could be governed legally and tyrannically by <em>the few</em>.... Where does this end? National Election 2012? We'll see soon enough.<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-20138942689873461962012-04-13T11:33:00.002-07:002012-04-16T21:17:27.284-07:00Purported: US "False Flag" Invasion RE Confirmed Alien Aircraft Fly-OversSomeone involved in producing this 6+ min. version of the original 3+ min. interview by Australia's MSN, has added a fear factor by inferring that the U.S. Marines sent there could be a sign of a possible alien planetary "invasion" in Australia. Further, there is a possibility that the U.S. administration may have a part in attempting to prevent Americans from knowing about the alien planetary fly-overs, because at some point they would not want the Americans to have the opportunity to interact with the alien star world people. There is a suggestion from information in the video, that both scenarios may become entirely separate "false flag" covert actions upon free people internationally, with entirely different effects. Problematic or pragmatic?<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Let's take a new look at this video published April 8, 2012. </span></span>From the Video Introduction presented at YouTube <a href="http://youtu.be/swjR00H2Jm0" rel="nofollow nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://youtu.be/swjR00H2Jm0</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> (6:36 min.) :</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"IT'S OFFICIAL: A member of the U.S. Air Command [Professor Paul Springer] with special clearance of White House, spoke earlier this Sunday, during an interview apparently aired <em>only by Australian MSM</em>, about the official plans of the U.S. military to fight a hostile alien invasion. Take in mind that TPTB are building a mega radio-telescope in Australia and New Zealand, for detecting an alien invasion...."</blockquote>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
First, the voice-over uses the term "false flag" invasion in this long version with additional images added to the original 3+ min. interview with Professor Paul Springer (url below). <em>False flag</em> refers to some covert or hidden mission, usually operating under the flag of a foreign nation for the purposes of deceiving the public and/or the enemy in some way. This has been an ops practice for centuries, even millennia, by military forces both in peace as well as in wartime. Nothing new here concerning the U.S. involvement in Australia, reported now to be <em>preparing U.S. Marines for any possible</em> alien planetary invasion. <br />
<br />
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-337o_cGy4_UZLH04NjG01YS_-DVzpwHlFBOb3bZkKShSilFEuoLAM2CacCrHWltMXRkXzDmAry53OAz8ZWVqJd9sZOQqVkv3FPJlgc7bAmcLAUCZYJe4BHYiBmmae4BV4XmWGMj3I3w/s1600/PaulSpringer--MSN-Alien-Prep.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" nda="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-337o_cGy4_UZLH04NjG01YS_-DVzpwHlFBOb3bZkKShSilFEuoLAM2CacCrHWltMXRkXzDmAry53OAz8ZWVqJd9sZOQqVkv3FPJlgc7bAmcLAUCZYJe4BHYiBmmae4BV4XmWGMj3I3w/s320/PaulSpringer--MSN-Alien-Prep.bmp" width="320" /></a></div>
The U.S. is a joint partner in the project of developing the powerful telescopes now established and working the skies over planet Earth from Australia. The telescopes were designed for the primary purpose of surveilling alien, other planetary aircraft flying over the Earth. <br />
<br />
As a result, multiple alien planetary aircraft were confirmed, they are here in the Earth's airspace. No longer is the question of the existence of alien star world people considered to be fantasy or merely a theory. We know for certain that indeed, other planets have intelligent, individual citizen people. Indeed, who are these "star people"? <br />
<br />
One does wonder why the development of this Australian, huge mega-radio telescope project was reported mostly in Australia, and now it has been announced that thousands of U.S. Marines were sent there. However, if this interview with Professor Springer of the national war college appeared on the MSN network in Australia, why was it not also reported by the U.S. MSN network? Afterall, the Professor had to get security clearance specifically to participate in this Australian MSN interview.<br />
<br />
That said, there is reason to be concerned why the voice-over tags the Australian-American alien aircraft telescope project as a "false flag" covert project. The producers of the long version discussing the Springer interview, either simply do not accept there is real evidence of star world aliens at all. Or they know indeed the aliens are here, and the voice-over at the end of the video indicates the U.S. government may have in mind to prevent Americans from having personal contact with the alien planetary people, because, as it states, it would possibly threaten the New World Order plan, which free people consider as a manipulated, eventual, fully fascist enslavement of humanity. Indeed, such a statement suggests that the producers of the long version of the Springer interview released "Easter Sunday", might believe that the planetary aliens may <em>come in peace</em>, perhaps more to prepare for their own intent to preserve and further enable the free world to further develop on Earth.</div>
<br />
Knowing what the telescopes have filmed of alien aircraft, then, listening to Professor Springer in his own words, without knowing much about the alien star people, it would be certainly a logical step to prepare our U.S. Marines for a possible invasion, <em>in the event it should become necessary</em>. But indeed as the voice over indicates at the end of the video, is there possibly a more sinister purpose in special training for our Marines about the alien capacity on our planet? Does it have to do with the New World Order plan for Earth people indeed....<br />
<br />
One statement made by Springer may be most significant, indicating the government intention is indeed to get to the bottom of <em>why the star people are here</em>. He notes very pointedly and astutely, there may be possible "doctrinal or technological" matters involved <em>in determining the reasons</em> for alien aircraft over the Earth. Perhaps we shall learn that the government already has an idea somehow that they come in peace, because of Springer's reference to "doctrinal" matters as a possibility. "Doctrinal" or primary form, "doctrine" suggests a potential of a deeply spiritual-political foundation concerning the purpose of our star world visitors on planet Earth.<br />
<br />
As it stands now, we must accept the word of our U.S. military war college training representative, Professor Springer, and continue to pay attention to other new developments at the same time. What is their purpose indeed? Are they here as friends or enemies of the nations of the earth? Are they here to protect the free peoples of the Earth.... Until we know why alien star people are here, it is too soon to conclude that the U.S. Marines landing in Australia, signals a "covert" operation coming "in Australia" that could be characterized as "false flag". <br />
<br />
As informative background concerning the reality we now have, of the presence of intelligent beings on other planets, below is a brief explanation of history concerning aliens on ancient planet Earth.</div>
<br />
<br />
<h4 class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
Ancient Evidence of Planetary Aliens on Earth</h4>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
<br /></div>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
The mainstream media (MSM) in America and in Europe has so far remained mum on many matters that citizens of free nations should know, indeed "need to know" from their news reports. This issue of other planetary aliens in our midst is one that is only now becoming a real life matter for us all as earth beings. It is one of which most citizens of Earth are either unaware, or they simply do not believe it's possible there are alien planetary beings visiting Earth. </div>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
<br /></div>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
<span class="text_exposed_show">We all must learn more about intelligent star-world people, because archaeological evidence has known for a very long time, of ancient astronauts in human form, going back to ancient tribal people who still lived in caves and huts, hunting for nuts and berries and wild meat when they could get it. We can ask, did aliens <em>then</em> do Earth humans any intentional, enemy harm? The written records have indicated alien star people were not primarily "enemies" of humans. Human star world people of human from on ancient planet earth certainly were not considered "evil" as a people, toward Earth people; however, the "greys" with oval heads and bulbous black eyes are recorded as being very dangerous; they specifically are known even from modern empirical evidence to abduct selected humans and perform scientific experiments on them. There is recorded history of an actual star world battle elsewhere in our galaxy, of "good" vs. "evil" people, which eventually led to the time of King Marduk of ancient Sumeria, after the colonization was finished on Earth and the leaders left the planet. In the past year, reports have increased significantly of "extraterrestrial spaceships" flying over Earth, some identified as "Gootans", others as "Keebles". The question is, "are they friends or enemies?"</span></div>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
<span class="text_exposed_show"><br />Concerning ancient colonization of Earth, ancient cuneiform records and images describing "alien gods" in <em>human form </em>coming to earth, were salvaged, transliterated and studied carefully in the 20th Century especially, by scientists, language experts, and collectors. Significant artifacts were carbon dated to ancient Sumeria, the first known civilization established even before the nation of Egypt. Let this be a first acknowledgment of an authoritative acceptance now of the Austrailian-American telecope project's confirmed reality of existing intelligent life on other planets, then. Many uninformed people now must also become aware that "we are not alone," and star world people have known of us on Earth, perhaps since before Sumeria. The Australian-American telescope project has confirmed the reality once and for all, to the point now where America is currently training Marines in Australia for some related role.<br />
</span><br />
</div>
<h4>
Conclusion</h4>
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><span class="text_exposed_show">Highly intelligent decisions must be made--not only by unknown elected and duly appointed government officials, but with the knowledge and understanding of the citizens who should also be prepared and properly informed about the real presence of alien star people. As well, we do not want this project in Australia to be in danger of <em>becoming </em>a "false flag" operation that, instead, places free nation citizens at risk in any way, especially those nations who traditionally protect other nations in need of our aid and comfort. That is, citizens should be watching very carefully to determine whether this justifiable planetary alien aircraft project might possibly become after all, some unique excuse for actions taken against Americans and citizens of other free nations. Especially, in America there is a danger of the violation of individual Constitutional protections, such as "martial law" would impose, and this is another fear conspiracy that has been batted about by Internet users over the past few years. Indeed, this fear may become fully justifiable, in that the alien watcher telescope project has been kept out of the news, and known almost exclusively by scientific and government experts.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><span class="text_exposed_show">"It is best to be prepared for anything," Professor Paul Springer said clearly in his Australian MSN interview. Time for all of us to <em>get real</em> now! Citizens <em>need to know</em>.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><span class="text_exposed_show">In any case, America and Australia must be very careful of NOT mistakenly "alienating" potential friends of our star world galaxy--while sorting out the good from the bad and otherwise "very ugly". Both the good and bad factors are acknowledged--and for now, at least, the proper communication is absent for experts and citizens who are intent on confirming anything for certain, either way, for now. We need further study on this issue, now that it is officially and publicly known, that there IS confirmation of alien planetary aircraft flying over Earth. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show">Linda Santucci</span><br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"></span><span class="text_exposed_show">April 14, 2012</span><br />
<br />
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
________________________________________ </div>
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
<span class="text_exposed_show"><br />If you have never heard about ancient star world people on Earth, this is excellent in providing some key evidence: <em>Klaus Dona : The Hidden History of the Human Race (March 2010)</em><br />
<a class="yt-uix-redirect-link" data-redirect-href-updated="true" dir="ltr" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmMwo1Xzgus" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmMwo1Xzgus">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmMwo1Xzgus</a><br />
<br />
Original 3+ min. Interview Video: <a href="http://video.au.msn.com/watch/video/alien-invasion/xxf5gut?cpkey=9646a5d6-7348-4640-8cf1-76881b3be000" rel="nofollow nofollow" target="_blank">http://video.au.msn.com/watch/video/alien-invasion/xxf5gut?cpkey=9646a5d6-7348-4640-8cf1-76881b3be000</a>)<br /><br />Reference, also included w/the top 6+ min. version, YouTube posting: <a href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread827927/pg1" rel="nofollow nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread827927/pg1</a><br /> </span></div>
<br />
<div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed">
</div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8491770677194523395.post-71990467250243766892012-04-10T14:20:00.003-07:002012-04-15T15:19:28.898-07:00How This Blog Got Its Name!Awakening this very morning, I saw still dreaming, Ronald Reagan on stage, front-center, with his <em>Country Band</em> behind him. Get it? USA Country Band! He was wearing blue jeans and a button, blue chambray shirt. I was far back in the audience. Everyone on stage was motionless, looking at me, no nods or anything revealing intent. Then I saw an Internet box where someone had selected a choice simply saying: GO. Okay, okay, I'm going with a nudge from a good friend--no thank you notes here, friend, because I have a feeling this will be hell to do! These are the times that try good souls.... Therefore, I have established a blog under the auspices of the <em>Gates of Vienna</em>. Thank you for inviting me to this hall of good souls doing their best to stand tall and deliver.... <br />
<br />
<em>Linda Santucci</em><br />
<em>April 10, 2012</em>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07207580512423949155noreply@blogger.com0